Esther M. Zimmer Lederberg
Catherine Macaulay

Whop1

Click images or captions to view pages

Breaking Up of the Bluestocking Club 1815 Rowlandson
Breaking Up of the Bluestocking Club: 1815 Rowlandson
Return


The effective view in society was that men could attain to the heights intellectually and aesthetically. Women were inherrently weaker and were inherently lesser in their abilities intellectually as well as aesthetically. Thus the proper place for a woman was in the home, helping her husband and children. The legal rights of women were effectively non-existent. A woman was like a child (legally), requiring a husband's supervision. Indeed, a definition of the word "husband": management and conservation. Many women in Jane Austen's time focused their attention upon cosmetics, fashion (very "French" or superficial), with the object of marrying a wealthy man. Men weren't much more advanced: consider these wives (no wonder the men absented themselves to their Black mistresses in the British West Indies)!

In the print above, Elizabeth Carter properly criticized Catherine Macauley:

Many Bluestockings looked far ahead of thier society, but not all of them. Hannah More's viewpoint was very Conservative: heavily influenced by religious dogma. Effectively, Hannah More wanted women to be "respectable" (according to her political and religious views). Women were to accept their naturally inferior selves. Women could help reclaim impoverished people that were criminals, mentally ill, alcoholics. One major way to reform would be for children to attend Sunday schools (perhaps 2 hours per week), to learn to read (mostly religious lectures, or religious tracts), and write.

Back

© Copyright 2006 - 2019    The Esther M. Zimmer Lederberg Trust     Website Terms of Use